🔗 Share this article

In a recent appearance, actor Jude Law stated he had no concerns about backlash for playing Vladimir Putin in a new film. The movie, though, may align so closely with the carefully constructed image promoted by official channels that, domestically, it reads as a compliment instead of a challenge.

The Manufactured Strongman

For years, the Russian political apparatus and its entertainment industry have worked together to craft a tailor-made version of the president. This character is a political superhero without age or mistakes, a former spy reframed as a local 007 who always knows beyond what he shows.

“Domestically, the constructed Putin has long eclipsed the real one.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

One recent example is a TV series released last fall, helmed by a pro-government filmmaker. Its main character is a fictional blue-eyed lieutenant colonel selected by fate to “rescue” the nation from disorder. Although the character's name a different name, the implication is clear: the savior must be a known figure from the secret services.

Western portrayals often end up buttressing this identical story instead of debunking it. A new film based on a popular book sets out to subvert the Putin cult by framing him as a symptom but as a consequence, moving the focus to the political machinery surrounding him.

The Myth of the Reluctant Leader

In the film, the president is presented as having been picked by powerful oligarchs to stabilise the country because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. The oligarchs approach him and all but beg him to take the top job. He replies is that he would prefer to rule from the background, desiring permanent power.

This narrative is a key piece of state propaganda: the cool, reluctant strategist shaped by destiny. In reality, none of this took place.

The Reality of the Casting Call

Nobody actually pleaded with Putin to take the job. The position was in essence a casting call with many candidates. At the centre to the selection stood an influential oligarch from the Yeltsin era who expected to run the country in practice.

• His list featured several politicians, among them an opposition leader later murdered and a security service director.
• According to a journalist who researched Putin’s biography, the chosen candidate merely met the required parameters: obedient, from the intelligence world, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A businessman familiar with the events stated the primary requirement was controllability and loyalty, not leadership.

“They didn’t need a strong candidate, they needed someone controllable, someone who would obey orders.”

Building the 007 Persona

Analysts concur that the notion of him as a master operative was constructed retrospectively. Stories about his “recruitment work” in Dresden do not stand up to scrutiny. In essence, he handled paperwork and technical tasks, a mid-level functionary not engaged in field operations.

Curiously, the shift to depicting him as a “007” may in part have been triggered by Daniel Craig’s debut as James Bond. His harder interpretation led local outlets and social media to make comparisons with their leader. Edited images replacing Craig’s face with Putin’s surfaced on city centers, feeding the growing tendency to see him as a local secret agent.

A Propaganda Win?

Given the casting, an star well-liked by Russian audiences, the authorities are likely to seize the chance to frame his casting as a minor diplomatic triumph. Its exclusion of mass protests, the political rivals, or key figures in the story, even though it includes recent years, is a pleasant bonus for state propaganda.

In Russian cinema, the president is frequently an all-powerful presence who never appears on screen. He is hinted at through photographs or orders from on high. In this new film, he finally acquires a recognizable face—one that could unintentionally echo the exact legends it perhaps aims to question.